A global geopolitical drama is unfolding under our eyes.
The rise of authoritarianism is upending the very definition of truth.
Our daily feeds from the media, social or otherwise, reductively encapsulated in our phones, are peppered with “fake news” and AI-generated content that are bending our very perception of what is real or imagined.
This Matrix-imbued blurring of reality points to an alarming trend:
The tools in the hands of the powerful to coerce and manipulate have reached new heights of technological sophistication.
The sponsors and beneficiaries of these instruments of control are increasingly unable – and unwilling – to tame their libidinal impulses. They make use of our very human cognitive frailties to further their profits and assert their influence over us, their target, as they infiltrate our lives with lies that they sell as truth. And we buy it!
What we are witnessing is a game of deception on a global scale.
Those at the top of the pile are dividing up the world into competing factions that all share a common goal, regardless of their respective ideologies: the authority, power and legitimacy to write and impose the rules of engagement. Inevitably, in the disquiet of this ongoing and tense dis-equilibrium, a state of permanent conflict becomes the default mode.
The oppressor and the victim take turns at role-playing in a merry-go-round of high-stake poker that is anything but merry.
Look no further than Russia, weakened and victimized by the dismantling of its entire “empire” of oppression becoming the aggressor in Ukraine and engaging in cyber warfare to destabilize its foes., Or take Israel, rising from the ashes of the holocaust, only to become a hegemonic, theocratic ethnostate, with its ongoing colonial and genocidal project against Palestinians—particularly in Gaza—that fuses victimhood with power and revenge.
The stakes are so high that there could not be a better time to bring our scrutiny to a favorite theme popularized in the 1950s during the Korean War that directly impacts our individual realities:
“Brainwashing”, or as some prefer to call it, coercive persuasion.
Looking back at the inglorious days of the Cold War, it is revealing in itself to learn the entire concept of brainwashing was born out a deep cultural blind spot presenting itself as a self-serving misunderstanding. The term was first introduced by US senator Hunter in a hearing when he chose to coin the word “brainwashing” as a rather illiteral translation of Xinao, its Chinese original equivalent.
As Annalee Newitz writes in A Brief, Weird History of Brainwashing (MIT Technology Review):
“Xinao (洗脑), translated as ‘wash brain’— has a long history going back to scientifically minded Chinese philosophers of the late 19th century, who used it to mean something more akin to enlightenment….
“Ironically, ‘brainwashing’ was not a widely used term among communists in China.
“The word xinao, is actually a play on an older word, xixin, or washing the heart, which alludes to a Confucian and Buddhist ideal of self-awareness.
“In the late 1800s, Chinese reformists such as Liang Qichao began using xinao—replacing the character for ‘heart’ with ‘brain’—in part because they were trying to modernize Chinese philosophy.”
What can be said of a culture that substitutes its heart for its brain? That turns the very principle of Buddhist enlightenment, the empty heart, into its exact opposite, a conniving mind?
Clearly, when it comes to truth, there is a fundamental paradox in our perception of what is and what is not that underscores the all too obvious disconnect.
Osho:
“If you are understood, know well, you must not be saying the truth. If you are misunderstood, there is a possibility that perhaps you have uttered the truth. It is a strange fate that misunderstanding by the people should become the definition of truth. People have been living in lies for centuries. So whenever somebody realizes the truth, it is bound to be misunderstood.”1
To add to the difficulties of reaching a more tangible definition, a universally accepted shared understanding of our realities, the meanings typically associated with brainwashing, conditioning and socialization are fraught with the pitfalls of double standard.
The terminology used does not reflect at all the substantive differences in methods but rather our normative judgements about the legitimacy of their influence.
Accusations of brainwashing aren’t neutral claims; they offer a particular explanation for why someone holds beliefs we find preposterous. If the term feels somewhat loaded and potentially problematic, it simply means that what it is applied to does not align with our own worldview. Moreover, these terms share a common characteristic with significant implications:
The absence of explicit consent and transparency that are prerequisites for real human agency.
Without being aware of the all-pervasive inherent subjective tilt in our labelling, we thus conveniently create arbitrary sandboxes in which we play out our favorite divisive games of cultural self-righteousness.
Brainwashing is thus associated with mind control, religious groups with indoctrination, creative advertising with marketing, fringe groups with propaganda, corporate team building with professional development and teaching patriotic history at school with nothing less than civic education.
What is at the root of this disparate fractioning of our realities?
In his seminal book Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst, Robert Sapolsky argues that it is our acquired propensity to discriminate against one another, our invention of “us” and “them” groups, be it on the basis of sex, race, nationality, class, age, religion or political affiliation, that opens the door for abuse and exploitation:
“A racial bias can be duped by something so simple as putting a cap with your favorite sports team’s logo on someone’s head, for example. You can overthrow your brain’s most primal reactions in this way but, as history shows, other people can also get in your head and manipulate the Us versus Them reflex to tragic and catastrophic results.”
Whether we are willing to admit it to ourselves or not, we are the product of a cultural paradigm where social norms and ethical systems are essentially forms of power-based manipulations that have successfully concealed their own coercive, biased nature and origins.
Starting with our cherished “education”, another loaded word that the literary theorist Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak has defined as the “non-coercive rearranging of desire.”
In a New Yorker essay titled It’s Always the Other Side That’s Been Brainwashed author Nikhil Krishnan introduces the blind spot paradox that is central to the stealthy aspect of our conditioning: our inability to perceive our own conditioning.
“The brainwashed can’t conceive of themselves as brainwashed; to do so would indicate that the brain remains unwashed.”
Or, as Rebecca Lemov succinctly puts it in The Instability of Truth: Brainwashing, Mind Control, and Hyper-Persuasion:
“If the method works, it erases itself.”
In other words, to be effective, any type of conditioning, whether it is seen as innocuous as “education” or as invasive and an assault on our sense of self and individual agency as “indoctrination”, has to create a perfect defense system against its own detection. It is no wonder then that it is so hard to accept that, qualitatively speaking, all forms of conditioning, from the apparently most benign to the most coercive, operate under the same guiding principles as those of any covert op.
When facts are turned into a hoax and the hoax becomes reality, the deceit is complete.
The most effective persuasion systems install their own framework for determining what constitutes valid evidence, creating a closed logical system.
In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn follows Galileo’s footsteps in challenging the scientific paradigms of “normalcy” that arbitrarily determines what questions can be asked and what counts as evidence. We see it today with climate denialism or with the US Secretary of Health’s campaign aimed at debunking over two centuries of scientific evidence on the effectiveness of vaccines, causing a growing minority of Americans say vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they are designed to prevent. We see it in the shameless addiction-inducive fast-food industry that has perfected the art of filling our emptinesses with junk. We see it in the recent discovery that all classic research studies on stress were based almost exclusively on males.
And the remarkable thing is that the entire cycle of “socialization” in its various forms and manifestations is nothing more than a systematic program of integration and compliance to a fixed paradigm.
Who is creating and perpetuating the paradigm?
Isn’t it by definition the blind product and outcome of generations of programming entirely designed to not only create those behavioral blind spots but to reinforce them?
The genius in all this is: as the “system” encourages us to hold onto beliefs, we rarely see them as programmed but rather as self-evident truths.
Osho:
“Every child is being “enveloped” by the parents, by the society, by the teachers, by the priests, by all the vested interests – enveloped in many layers of conditioning. He is given a certain religious ideology: he is forced to become a Jew or a Christian or a Hindu or a Mohammedan. It is not his choice.
And whenever somebody is forced – without his choice – you are crippling the person, you are destroying his intelligence.
“You are not giving him a chance to choose, you are not allowing him to function intelligently; you are managing it in such a way that he will function only mechanically.”2
And here we are, clinging to our own convictions while absolutely certain “the other” is dead wrong and completely misguided.
The arbitrariness of what defines us in the tiny capsule of time we live in is staggering. What happened in China with the cultural revolution illustrates how quickly our identity on this planet can be upended as Confucianism, in the blink of a planetary eye, gave way to Communism, explaining perhaps the unfortunate heart-to-brain mix-up….
Osho:
“China is one of the ancientmost countries, maybe the most ancient. It has the ancientmost scriptures, the longest tradition of religion: Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism; it has created great enlightened people, has always lived in a religious way. And what happened? Suddenly all the Bibles, Korans, Dhammapadas, Vedas, Tao Te Ching, Analects of Confucius disappeared. People started carrying a small red book written by Mao Zedong; that became their Bible. Suddenly God no longer exists, the soul is just nonsense, meditation a wastage of time; prayer, foolishness. Temples toppled down, monasteries evaporated: within a few years, all was gone.”3
If randomness is often seen as deterministic, and if the circumstances of our existence are out of our hands, it does not mean we do not have individual agency over our lives.
To better understand how we can break out of this vicious cycle, and reclaim our true selves amid a flood of political disinformation, fake news, fake reviews, falsified or fabricated studies, scams, victim blaming – the list goes on – we must first examine what makes these exploitation methods successful tools of mind control.
They succeed because they operate largely below conscious awareness, targeting automatic rather than deliberative thinking processes.
Effective manipulation doesn’t fight our biases—it aligns with them, making deception feel like natural, independent reasoning.
Take for example “conversion therapy” that is still practiced and enforced on the LGBTQ+ community and causes significant psychological harm. To justify the practice, these “non-conforming” individuals are stigmatized as “confused” or “deviant” by their enforcers who themselves hold the view that heteronormativity is “natural”. Or, when the Chinese subject the Uighurs to incarceration in “reeducation camps”, claiming all along to counter their “indoctrination” by an opposing ideology that engages in similar practices under different labels. After World War two, in an effort to urgently undo the sexual legacy of fascism, the Berlin Senate, overturning all ethical norms, went as far as supporting an experimental program that placed foster children with pedophiles.
And to move on from the most brazen to the most insidious, we only need to look at the helplessness we feel when scrolling endlessly down the rabbit hole of our social media feeds. The algorithms that animate them amount to “massive-scale emotional engineering” taken to its nefarious ends. Their only purpose is to maximize engagement by serving content that confirms and therefore reinforces existing biases through the echo chamber of our compartmentalized worldview.
These digital amplifiers strengthen “groupthink”, group identification to a political or religious ideology, all the while creating the illusion of comprehensive awareness.
In the AI-generated book Hypnocracy that started as a hoax only to become, when later exposed, a “philosophical experiment”, its author, himself an AI-fabricated fiction, posits:
“What if the truth is no longer something to be revealed, but something to be constructed, engineered and sold?
We now live in “a system where power operates directly on consciousness, creating permanent altered states through the algorithmic manipulation of attention and perception.
“Digital platforms are not mere communication tools; they are hypnotic technologies actively reshaping how we perceive and interpret reality.”
The common thread running through the miasma of power dynamics, double standards and ethical issues governing any form of brainwashing, is the enforcement of ideological conformity by dominant power structures.
Each and every one part of this largely automated – i.e. unconscious – machine is vying for a piece of the pie that is your brain.
The implication being individual autonomy and agency are directly targeted and challenged.
Stay tuned for part two of this article, “The Essence of Meditation – Reclaiming the Empty Heart”, in which we will explore how to break this unconscious cycle and fully reclaim the narrative of our lives.
END
Leave a Reply